josh (joshc) wrote,

fake headlines

Almost every story about the New York Times report on the way that headline writing has changed to accommodate the armies of robots searching the web for news implies that the new, more searchable, informative headlines are boring and provide a generally substandard user experience:
"You put those demands, and that you know you're also writing for search engines, and you tend to write headlines that are more straightforward," said Lou Ferrara, online editor of The Associated Press. "My worry is that some creativity is lost." [nyt]

But I wonder if the "clever" headlines increasingly being reserved for print editions are actually better in any measurable sense other than keeping punny headline writes in business. Do readers actually enjoy them? Are people more likely to read an article accompanying a cute headline only when they're reading a news printed in ink rather than in pixels?

It's just seems really strange that the reaction to "we now have tons of data about which stories attract readers" is "let's change the way stories are labeled online and disregard this pesky information for our print edition".

  • hello comrades

    Huh. This is a weird welcome back to my annual visit of the old Livejournal friendship page. It reminds me of how, at the time, I thought it was…

  • (no subject)

    The aftermath of the election makes it seem like we're all in for a very serious emo time, better suited to journaling than yelling on Facebook, yet…

  • Does xJournal Still work?

    Hey. it does!

  • Post a new comment


    Comments allowed for friends only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 1 comment