josh (joshc) wrote,

hmmm. explainer rains on our parade?

So, as the election approaches, I've been wondering why activist groups haven't tried to make voting more entertaining, as suggested by "Why We Hate Voting -- and how to make it fun again" [slate].

Today, Slate's explainer tells us that it's illegal to buy votes, even if it's with underwear (a la Michael Moore) [slate].

I hope that doen't invalidate the VOTEorNOT raffle. I could use the cash.

My guess is that it doesn't since you aren't actually required to register or vote to be entered in the drawing. As far as I can tell, the site's purpose seems to be aimed at viral marketing of registration information, since checking-up on voting would be really complicated, and probably illegal.
  • Post a new comment


    Comments allowed for friends only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded